A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that's partly constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where views of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the positioning became one of the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as produced, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal see, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've explained their prolonged-standing connection to the world and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair just attempting to produce a household residence in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one functions are performed according to Specialist information and accepted programs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering The ocean throughout a storm, will not change the fundamental details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for just a circumstance that many observers see as ever more widespread. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between personal land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming additional contentious.
The Irish Times write-up about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved in neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly various professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design will work at the positioning on Dublin Paul Feely Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.